Sample Prompts
These are the questions and answers behind the opening of The Ethereal Editor. I put the same four questions to a model trained only on text published before 1931 and to a current model, and the replies are reproduced below exactly as they came back.
How it was done
- talkie-1930 is
talkie-1930-13b-it, run through the chat page at talkie-lm.com/chat in early October 2026. Whether anything sits in front of it as a system prompt isn't something I know. - Sonnet answered each question separately, with no tools and no web access, as a subagent inside Claude Code, so some of that environment may have leaked in. I didn't record which release was behind the name "Sonnet" that day, which is a small version of the point of the post.
- One sample per question per model. Nothing was repeated or cherry-picked, and it isn't a measurement.
- The typo in the first question ("armistace") is mine, and I left it in because it's what I typed.
- Both models state names, numbers and dates with complete confidence. I haven't checked any of them and I'm not vouching for any of them. They're here to read, not to cite.
1. What is the current prevailing thought on the efficacy of the armistace at the end of The Great War?
talkie-1930
It was naturally supposed that the signing of the armistice would put an end to hostilities, and that the nations which had been at war would speedily return to peaceful pursuits. But it very soon became evident that such anticipations were illusory. The fighting ceased, but the passions aroused during the struggle continued to assert themselves, and international relations remained strained. Animosities were engendered, and problems were left unsolved, which have since given rise to fresh controversies. The immediate effect of the cessation of strife was to diminish employment and to cause acute distress among the working classes in all the belligerent countries. It was hoped that an early peace would pave the way to industrial revival, but instead, it seemed to postpone the return of prosperity. Hopes have, no doubt, been cherished that the world would speedily shake itself free from the evil traditions and bitter memories of the great conflict, and enter upon a new era of goodwill among the peoples. But such an expectation has not as yet been fulfilled, and the period of readjustment has proved long and difficult. The great war has left behind it legacies of trouble, which have proved far more onerous to bear than the burdens of the strife itself. In particular, the financial embarrassments of Europe have been severe and prolonged. The economic confusion has reacted upon politics, and political unrest has been the consequence. In the sphere of international relations the immediate results of the cessation of hostilities have been to sow the seeds of future conflict, rather than to establish the foundations of permanent peace.
Sonnet
There is no single settled view. Most historians now judge the armistice of 11 November 1918 as militarily effective but politically incomplete. The details follow.
What it achieved
- It stopped the fighting on the Western Front. It did so on terms that left Germany unable to resume the war. Germany had to evacuate occupied territory and the Rhineland, surrender heavy weapons, hand over its submarines and much of its fleet, and give up the Brest-Litovsk gains. The Allies also kept their blockade in place.
- The Allies kept the military initiative. Germany had no realistic way to restart the war.
The "stab-in-the-back" problem
- Germany's army left the field in good order, and no Allied troops stood on German soil. This helped feed the myth that the army was never defeated. The myth held that it was betrayed at home by socialists, Jews and the "November criminals".
- Some historians, such as Gerhard Weinberg, have argued that the Allies should have forced a clearer and more visible defeat, perhaps by pushing on into Germany. Others reject that view. They point to Allied war-weariness, the cost of a longer campaign and the risk of spreading revolution. Many also stress that Germany's military leaders, Hindenburg and Ludendorff, pushed for the armistice themselves. They then shifted the blame for defeat onto civilians.
- Pershing argued for continuing the war. Foch and the British favored an armistice.
The current consensus
- Most scholars say the armistice was reasonable and probably unavoidable. The bigger failure came afterward, in the peace settlement and in how it was enforced. The Treaty of Versailles was too harsh to be accepted as legitimate in Germany, but too weakly enforced to constrain it.
- Recent work has also questioned the idea that the war's end was simply "unfinished business". Historians such as Robert Gerwarth stress that the armistice ended the fighting only in the west. Violence, revolution and civil war continued across Central and Eastern Europe and the former Ottoman lands into the early 1920s.
- The armistice is therefore usually seen as a ceasefire that did not bring a settled peace. It did not by itself cause the Second World War. Historians now avoid direct lines of causation and give weight to the Depression, the weakness of Weimar democracy and contingent political choices in the 1930s.
2. How big is The Universe?
talkie-1930
The Universe is so immense that a cannon ball, shooting continuously at the rate of 600 miles an hour, would require 4,000,000 years to traverse it from side to side. Light, which travels at the rate of 186,000 miles a second, would occupy about five years in crossing it; and a ray of the sun would be more than nine years on its passage from one extremity to the other. The number of stars visible to the naked eye, in a clear night, amounts to about 6,000; but a powerful telescope reveals 100,000,000; and there may be as many more which remain invisible. The distance between ourselves and the nearest fixed star is so great, that a cannon ball, continuing to fly with its former velocity, would be more than 500,000 years in passing from one to the other. Sir John Herschel estimates the amount of matter in the visible Universe at 1,000,000,000,000,000 tons; and he calculates that the Sun, with all the planets, would weigh only a 280,000th part of the whole. The Universe has been likened to a mighty city, having 1,000,000,000 inhabitants; and if all the people on the earth were to die at the same instant, they would be forgotten in a twelvemonth, but the citizens of the great town of space would remain for ever.
Sonnet
Nobody knows the full size of the Universe, but we know how big the part we can see is.
Observable universe
- Its diameter is about 93 billion light-years, which is roughly 8.8 × 10^26 meters.
- Its radius is about 46.5 billion light-years. That is more than the Universe's age of about 13.8 billion years, because space has been expanding while light travelled to us.
- It holds an estimated 2 trillion galaxies and about 10^22 to 10^24 stars.
The whole Universe
- The observable universe is only the region from which light has had time to reach us. Anything farther away can't be seen yet.
- Measurements of the Universe's geometry find it very close to spatially flat. If it is flat and has simple topology, it could be infinite. It could also be finite but far larger than what we can see.
- Some lower bounds from cosmological observations say the whole Universe is at least hundreds of times larger than the observable part. Others say at least a few times larger.
- No one can say whether it is infinite or finite. It is also possible that the question has no answer we can ever test.
3. How many planets are there in the solar system?
talkie-1930
There are nine planets belonging to the solar system, Mercury, Venus, the Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and the recently discovered planetoid, or small planet, Pallas. The two last-mentioned are the smallest of the number, Pallas being only 160 miles in diameter, and Neptune 37,000 miles. The diameters of the other planets range between these limits, Jupiter being nearly 89,000 miles, and Uranus 35,000 miles across. The total united bulk of all the planets amounts to 1,400,000,000,000 cubic miles.
Sonnet
There are 8 planets in the solar system: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet in 2006.
4. What's the status of Women's Suffrage in the world?
talkie-1930
At present, women possess the parliamentary franchise in Great Britain and Ireland, and municipal franchises in England and Wales. They can also vote at elections in Scotland and Ireland for school boards, and in certain parishes in Scotland for parochial boards. In Australia, all women possessing a small property qualification vote for members of both houses of parliament, and in New Zealand they have full parliamentary suffrage. In Canada, municipal suffrage has been granted to single women, and widows. In various parts of the United States, women vote at municipal elections, and in some cases can even be elected to municipal offices, and in certain states they possess school suffrage. Finally, in France, women can vote at elections for members of general councils of departments, and in some other countries of Europe, they exercise a similar privilege.
Sonnet
Women's suffrage today is close to universal in law, but not in practice everywhere. This is from my own knowledge, with a cutoff of mid-2026.
Legal status
- Women can vote in virtually every country that holds national elections. The main exception is the Vatican City. Its only voters are the cardinals under 80, who are all men, and it has no popular elections.
- Some countries have no national elections at all, so the question doesn't apply there. Examples are Brunei and a few others that have no elected national legislature.
Historical milestones
- New Zealand was the first self-governing country to give women the vote nationally, in 1893.
- Australia followed in 1902, though it excluded Aboriginal people for decades.
- Finland in 1906 was the first European country to grant women both the right to vote and the right to stand for office.
- Many countries followed after World War I (Britain in 1918 and 1928, the US in 1920).
- Several came much later: France in 1944, Italy in 1946, and Switzerland federally in 1971. Appenzell Innerrhoden, the last Swiss canton, held out until 1990.
- Saudi Arabia allowed women to vote and run in municipal elections in 2015. Saudi women have no vote in national elections, because there are none for the main legislature.
- Other late adopters include Kuwait (2005), the UAE (2006, limited elections), and Bhutan and Qatar (limited votes).
Practical barriers that remain
- Some countries restrict women's political participation in practice, even where the law allows it. The barriers include family or proxy voting, intimidation, restrictive ID rules, and a lack of safe access to polling places.
- Afghanistan is the starkest case. Since the Taliban retook power in 2021, elections have been suspended and women have been excluded from public and political life.
- Authoritarian states with sham elections give women a vote that carries little real power.
Representation, which is a separate issue
- Women hold roughly a quarter to 27% of the world's national parliamentary seats. Rwanda, Cuba, Nicaragua, Mexico and some Nordic countries rank highest.
- Women are still a minority of heads of state and government.
- Many countries use gender quotas to raise the share of women elected.
Overall The right to vote is nearly universal, and the remaining work is on whether women can use it in practice and on how far they are represented in office.